Wednesday, June 1, 2011

kim kardashian w magazine cover

kim kardashian w magazine cover. W Magazine Cover. Kim
  • W Magazine Cover. Kim



  • miles01110
    Dec 21, 04:45 PM
    Unfortunately, facts do not matter to these people, as most IT departments are clueless about TCO.

    Actually most IT managers/departments are very informed about TCO, which is why they don't shell out the money for hardware that is 2x as expensive, software that is 4x as expensive (due to miserable volume licensing plans for OS X), the cost of training support and logistics personnel to support Macs/OS X, and the amount of time it will take to retrain users to use the new hard/software.

    Ironically, most people who make statements such as yours either aren't in IT or have a very unrealistic view of the world.


    I would really like some good arguments to put to him regarding why mac's should be allowed on our company network and should form part of our IT systems.

    When you write your proposal, consider using proper English grammar. "Macs" as in "a number of computers made by Apple" does not, notice, have an apostrophe.

    The basic fact of the matter is that large, established Windows-based network infrastructures have no incentive at all to switch to Apple machines.


    Enterprise-support from the manufacturer (Apple)? HUGE fail.

    Seriously. This is what guarantees Dell's, HP's, and RIM's complete dominance of the enterprise market. Who would have guessed that when your central business functions depend on your hardware being "up" it doesn't cut it to have to bring a unit into an Apple Store?





    kim kardashian w magazine cover. Kim Kardashian#39;s Racy W
  • Kim Kardashian#39;s Racy W



  • 2 Owls
    Aug 2, 11:18 AM
    Any larger versions out there? It is a lovely image but too small a resolution for my monitor.

    Here is a zip containing the picture in a range of sizes from John Carey the artists website:
    fiftyfootshadows.net (http://files.fiftyfootshadows.net/going_home.zip)





    kim kardashian w magazine cover. kim kardashian w magazine
  • kim kardashian w magazine



  • baleensavage
    Jan 9, 03:33 PM
    I too was disappointed with the keynote today.

    The iPhone is a great device, but nothing that I'd buy. If they get rid of the phone capabilities and make it a real video iPod with wifi, I'd be all over it. Plus the whole cingular thing is a downer. On the whole though it was a good announcement for Apple and I'm sure it will revolutionize the cell phone industry.

    The iTV is lame. All it is is a front row interface to your computer with a hard drive. Nothing really exciting there. Like others have mentioned, add in Web browsing, a DVD drive, the ability to record TV onto the hard drive, then maybe it would be worth the $300 price tag.

    And removing Computers from the name makes sense, but it doesn't bode well for the computers part of Apple.

    As for not having 10.5 info, I'm actually glad that they didn't. Vista is just out of the box. Let Vista cool off a little before Apple blows it out of the water. We don't want Microsoft stealing Apple's thunder with their 3-years-too-late OS. It'd be like if Apple released the iPhone right after the Zune thing came out.





    kim kardashian w magazine cover. kim kardashian w magazine
  • kim kardashian w magazine



  • shk718
    Apr 28, 06:03 AM
    apparently apple needs to educate the local news programs better. my local nbc news reporter in nyc just said that "the iphone does send tracking information back to apple".



    more...


    kim kardashian w magazine cover. Kim Kardashian Covers W
  • Kim Kardashian Covers W



  • Mal
    Dec 1, 04:48 PM
    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/12428034/Screen%20shot%202010-12-01.png

    One of a bunch that circulate through right now. This particular one is from Schneider Studios on DeviantArt. (http://browse.deviantart.com/?qh=&section=&global=1&q=SchneiderStudios#/d2elxwf)

    That's Adium with a custom theme, and MacLampsX (http://arcticmac.home.comcast.net/~arcticmac/software/maclampsx.html) doing the bulbs on the screen edges. I usually show my Dock, but didn't want to block any more of the bulbs than necessary.

    jW





    kim kardashian w magazine cover. Kim Kardashian x Barbara
  • Kim Kardashian x Barbara



  • ViciousShadow21
    Dec 15, 08:12 AM
    Kate from Lost

    future ex-wife

    i believe she is currently dating a hobbit named Merry, so you dont have much competition.



    more...


    kim kardashian w magazine cover. Kim Kardashian W Magazine 2010
  • Kim Kardashian W Magazine 2010



  • eternlgladiator
    Feb 18, 02:49 PM
    Werd.

    http://img816.imageshack.us/img816/311/screenshot20110214at435.jpg
    http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/311/screenshot20110214at435.jpg

    Where did you get that wallpaper? Its awesome.





    kim kardashian w magazine cover. kim kardashian w cover
  • kim kardashian w cover



  • djpraize
    Apr 25, 05:54 AM
    I'm debating. I actually am within my 30 day window of having bought a Black iPhone 4 (had to switch corporate phone line to personal liable plan). No way I would pay money just to switch colors, but I always wanted a white iPhone. I think I'll mosey to AT&T, see how it looks, and if I like it and AT&T will swap, I'll get it.

    I really like the black iPhone as well, so either way I'm happy.



    more...


    kim kardashian w magazine cover. kim kardashian w magazine
  • kim kardashian w magazine



  • Shaved Kitty
    Jun 17, 01:05 AM
    who is going to the ATT store across the street from Wharton?





    kim kardashian w magazine cover. kim kardashian w magazine
  • kim kardashian w magazine



  • kainjow
    Mar 20, 03:34 PM
    This is piracy, not allowed here. See forum rules.



    more...


    kim kardashian w magazine cover. W Magazine Kim Kardashian Pics
  • W Magazine Kim Kardashian Pics



  • ziggyonice
    Apr 30, 07:22 PM
    ...The whole Castle in the Cloud theme. It works.

    https://img.skitch.com/20110501-bkeumqpah8e93ddxh6wpfhxktb.jpg (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0u9QNYjYvYQ#t=0m25s)

    Any Les Miserables fans here? (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0u9QNYjYvYQ)





    kim kardashian w magazine cover. Kim-Kardashian-W-Magazine-
  • Kim-Kardashian-W-Magazine-



  • samiwas
    Mar 3, 04:37 PM
    I know you WANT to give your solution... you're so close... c'mon... say it: "I think we should drastically increase taxation on wealthy Americans to fix this problem."
    What I want to know is how exactly you expect businesses to grow jobs, expand operations, etc. in this type of situation. It seems fairly clear based on the facts that A) this wouldn't be near enough money to solve the problem B)that the end result in the long run will almost certainly be less growth, fewer jobs, and less government 'revenue' than before. C) that you'd kill what chance we have left at regaining a strong economy as large businesses would do whatever they could to get their assets in locations of lower tax burden.

    Can you point me to a time in history where lower taxes led to more growth? Can you point me to the time when high taxes meant things were not progressing? As I seem to recall from the history classes I mostly failed, the mid-20th century was quite a boom for this country, right? Since I'm not so good at history, I looked up tax rates.

    The last time tax rates were as low as they are now started in about 1925. What followed 5 years later? The Great Depression and massive unemployment. Shortly after 1930, tax rates skyrocketed. You know what else happened around that time? Massive growth and employment. Then, since 1981 when taxes started getting much lower, the economy slowly started to go downhill. Many people were still making gobs of money, but the middle class started to see things going away. There must be some huge factor I'm missing. Maybe you can fill me, and everyone else here, in.

    And as for me wanting to "drastically increase taxes on wealthy Americans", you can stop right there. I want to get rid of the TAX BREAKS, the TAX CUTS...for everyone, and especially for excessively wealthy people.

    'turned into' a a profit machine? As opposed to... when?
    Providing health services and goods has always been a for-profit enterprise. This is exactly what has lead to the amazing growth in medical technology in the past 100 years.


    While the advances in medical technology are great, let's not for one second think that the massive profit machine known as the health care industry is not as corrupt as can be. You take a service that by it's very definition is essential for life, and turn it into a profit operation...nothing good can come from that. That's why a Tylenol in a hospital costs $14 and you go in for a bad cough and walk out with a $21,000 bill. Ludicrous.

    I tend to agree. Cut programs until our expenses match our current 'revenues.' When the two are equal or are in the black, let's immediately pass an balanged-budget amendment so this problem never happens again.

    I think we definitely need to include in the cuts the health care and pensions for all senators, congressmen, house members, and any other "lawmaker" types.

    For the record, they are paying their fair share. The top 50% of wage earners pay over 95% of the income tax.

    And as pointed out above, they also make and have the vast majority of the money in this country.

    If 90 people make $1,000 each, and 10 people make $50,000 each and they were evenly taxed on income, you'd still have 10% of the people paying 84.7% of the taxes. Is that unfair? No, it's not. Not in the slightest. And once you take out even a basic cost-of-living exemption, which should be the start of any tax system, that number would increase dramatically. Like, just over 95% maybe?

    In this free market, you have the choice to make more money. And if you want to make metric ass-tons of money, you can pay the taxes that go along with that. Free market capitalism.

    I agree. I would start with a MASSIVE simplification of the tax code, and virtual elimination of all government subsidies over the next 5-10 years.

    Probably the only thing I agree with you on. Individual tax returns should require a post card and nothing else. Corporate taxes, well...I don't know enough about them to know how to simplify them, but I'm sure they are ridiculously complex.

    I tend to agree. Reduce the budget by half, let them become more efficient and more reliant on technology. Take a more defensive posture around the globe and avoid entangling alliances, etc. abroad. That being said, I believe its important for us to maintain a strong national DEFENSE. We do have enemies... and defense is one of the primary constitutional roles of the federal government.

    OK, two things.

    If the top 50% are declaring earnings equivalent to 88% of the total, it seems entirely proportionate that they should be paying 95% of the total tax. Their true earnings are probably vastly more in percentage terms, anyway.

    Yep.



    more...


    kim kardashian w magazine cover. kim kardashian w magazine
  • kim kardashian w magazine



  • DroidRules
    Apr 4, 06:51 PM
    Chupa Chupa I'm with you and others that have agreed with you.

    You people want to bitch about at&t so much you don't even know what you're bitching about. You signed a 2, two, dos, zwei, hul�t, ǧūǧ, laba, שְׁנַ֫יִם, year contract..... No matter what language you say it in that number is TWO. AT&T has no obligation to let you upgrade early at any price. Stop whining and crying and throwing a fit and be a grown up and deal with the contract you signed. Don't like it pay the ETF and go else where.





    kim kardashian w magazine cover. Kim Kardashian November 2010 W
  • Kim Kardashian November 2010 W



  • Otaillon
    Aug 7, 11:16 PM
    http://cl.ly/054a5eb400e758f4b849/content



    more...


    kim kardashian w magazine cover. Image: Kim Kardashian
  • Image: Kim Kardashian



  • Howardchief
    Apr 25, 07:09 AM
    Bad poll





    kim kardashian w magazine cover. kim kardashian nude for W
  • kim kardashian nude for W



  • 7thMac
    Jan 12, 07:11 PM
    I agree that the new design is very bland. I think they know what they are doing. The car companies seem to believe that this type of design will sell the most cars in the U.S. The Hyundai Sonata is a slight break from this mold.



    more...


    kim kardashian w magazine cover. Kim Kardashian W magazine
  • Kim Kardashian W magazine



  • donlphi
    Nov 20, 04:32 PM
    just to clear something up. This right now appears to be a text-based phone. I don't think Wu is talking about iChat AV functionality. Some other sites (of much, much less accuracy) have been claiming that the iPhone would be able to do videoconferencing and whatnot, but currently there isn't any good evidence to support this, and in my opinion it doesn't look like current 3G GSM cellular networks simply don't have the duplex bandwidth to deliver that kind of content. (and 4G is still a ways off)

    This is why I think it is pointless to do it unless you are connected to an EV-DO revision A connection. I don't need another "awesome phone" regardless of how well it syncs with iLIFE. I would much rather be able to travel and show somebody what I see, rather than talk about it or send a photo.

    EV-DO revision A allows you to connect wirelessly at speeds fast enough to video chat. TEXT im feature is pointless... I can do that on any phone. I'm sure Apple has figured out a FASTER way to type than T9 Word or something.

    We need to forget about this 3G & 4G GSM worthless networks. Sony did it right by pairing up with Sprint. If I didn't hate Windows so much, I would buy that new ultra-portable VAIO TXN17P/T Notebook they just came out with.

    Oh well... we'll wait for our 3G or 4G iPhone before getting it right I'm sure.





    kim kardashian w magazine cover. The Kardashian cover was shot
  • The Kardashian cover was shot



  • okdaa
    May 3, 03:50 AM
    I started donating blood before I joined MacRumors, sorry :D





    kim kardashian w magazine cover. Kim Kardashian W Magazine nude
  • Kim Kardashian W Magazine nude



  • Mitthrawnuruodo
    Dec 18, 06:46 PM
    He-he... that is slightly disturbing...

    ...and very cool... :D





    fenixx
    Oct 5, 04:51 PM
    mmm, leopard anticipation building!





    bousozoku
    Feb 14, 07:36 PM
    In hindsight, I think I may have been high on Vegemite when I posted this. On that note, I'm gonna go eat some Vegemite.

    Could we use that on some of the bad users? I've heard that it can also be used as road and roof patch. :p





    Blakeasd
    May 2, 08:41 PM
    Nevermind I just ran the project again and it worked :confused:





    Flying Llama
    Aug 21, 05:14 PM
    Similar to #12, but with a sky background. I know, it's choppy and bad quality but if it weren't it would be 170k :eek:





    grue
    Nov 24, 08:07 PM
    These days not having any kind of native AVCHD support really slows you down (and uses up a lot of storage space) particularly considering the DSLR-hype since 2009!


    Well to be fair, the camera manufacturers are twats for recording to a delivery codec in the first place



    Total Pageviews